Welcome..... Wissup??

WISSUP - WISCONSIN SPEAKS UP


Copyright (c) 2009 Ginny Maziarka. All rights reserved.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Doctors for America NOT What It Sounds Like


Hmmmmmmmmm......

The doctor made a White House call Monday -- 150 of them, in fact, all costumed in white hospital coats -- to try to help President Obama administer a booster shot to his ailing health care reform drive.
White House spokesman Reid Cherlin described the assembled physicians, from all 50 states, as the best voices for reform because they witness the current health care system on a day-to-day basis.
"These folks know better than anybody about what works and what doesn't,"
.........
But the doctors in the Rose Garden were all supporters of health care reform -- and the invitation-only guest list drew heavily from Doctors for America, a grassroots organization that backs a government-run insurance option.
.........
"It just appears that President of the United States, at this point, is choosing to meet with only those who support his agenda," added Dr. Margaret Flowers, a Maryland pediatrician..

It seems BHO is leaning heavily on Doctors for America to lend credibility and "sell" his health care reform package.  Is it any surprise this group was formerly known as Doctors for Obama?  I think this group needs to be innoculated.


Monday, October 5, 2009

West Bend School Board Work Session TODAY: 4:30. SIT IN AND LISTEN.

WEST BEND JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1
735 South Main, West Bend, Wisconsin 53095
Joint Board of Education/CFAC (Citizens Financial Advisory
Committee) Work Session
Education Service Center
Board Room
October 5, 2009
4:30-8:00 p.m.
Agenda
1. Call to Order
2. Frame alternatives for levy reduction through program impact and fees
3. Key Points to Report at Next Board Meeting
4. Adjourn

The Truth Hurts ~ Dining out on West Bend's tax dollars - School Board eats crow

Maybe this doesn't seem like too big of a deal.  In terms of actual spending, it isn't.  The underlying issue isn't the menu, the restaurant, or the final bill.  The issue here is "trust" and "representation of the taxpayers."  Quite frankly, I don't think Pat and Joe are the representatives for us. We need fresh new faces and new leadership.  Most certainly, we don't think the damage that has been done is repairable.


West Bend Daily News, 10/03/09

West Bend School District treats leadership team to dinner
West Bend School District taxpayers have picked up the tab for a pair of dinner meetings for administrators, principals and School Board members in the past four months.

    “One time a year we pull the board and leadership team together for a dinner,” said Superintendent Pat Herdrich.

    This year’s dinner at Timmer’s cost $21 a person for a total of $743.

    In 2008, the dinner was held at the Clairemont Inn at a cost of $26 per person for a total of $1,066.

    The tab is paid out of the superintendent’s budget.

    The dinners are part of the district’s “reward and recognition system,” Herdrich said.

    Board member Kathy Van Eerden said she thinks the dinner is a justified use of taxpayer money. 



.........


Board member Kris Beaver said the dinner is money well spent.

    “We could have wrapped up our own sandwiches at home and sat and people still would have been critical of it,” said Beaver. “I could go find 10 people in this community and said we’re going to go wrap up sandwiches and we’re going to sit around picnic tables and do our leadership development at Regner Park. They’d look at me and go ‘You’re out of your everlovin’ mind.’ 



.........


Neighboring school districts said they don’t make similar expenditures.



........


 In Kewaskum, Superintendent Michael Krumm said his school district rarely spends money on office parties, board meetings or get-togethers.

    “We’ve even cut back on teacher in-service luncheons,” said Krumm.

    The Kewaskum district has one luncheon with cafeteria-style food during a full day in-service “because it’s more efficient,” Krumm said. 


Saturday, October 3, 2009

Focus on the Family digs heels in with Banned Books Week


Responding to Banned Books Week

 
A pro-family group is suggesting a creative way for families to act as "salt and light" in response to the American Library Association's (ALA) so-called Banned Books Week.
Focus on the Family is encouraging donations of books to neighborhood and school libraries: books that communicate a Christian and socially conservative perspective on hot-button issues such as homosexuality and abortion. The effort coincides with the ALA's annual twisting of the First Amendment, as it showcases books to which parents have objected — and which libraries have generally not pulled from shelves.

"Every year, the ALA and other liberal groups use this trumped-up event to intimidate and basically silence concerned parents," said Candi Cushman, education analyst for Focus on the Family Action. "The truth is, parents have every right and responsibility to object to their kids receiving sexually explicit and pro-gay literature without their permission, especially in a school setting."

The ALA claims that Banned Books Week is all about celebrating "availability of those unorthodox or unpopular viewpoints."

Cushman said it's time for families to turn the tables and challenge the ALA to honor its own principles. 

"You can do this most effectively by simply going to your local public library, or a school library," she said, "and donating books that communicate your family's perspective on those issues."

FOR MORE INFORMATION
Learn more about balancing bias in your library.

Hudson Library shares common bond of sexually explicit materials for minors with West Bend Library

'Library' Article Hit Close to Home
By Meredith Berg

EDITOR, Wisconsin Christian News:

I was saddened to read the front page article last month, (WCN Volume 10, Issue 5), regarding the efforts of a few people in West Bend who had the courage to fight against the entrenched (and evil) American Library Association, which supports every kind of filth and vulgarity in our libraries. The story reminded me of the failure in my hometown of Hudson, several years ago, when we attempted to do the same thing, but failed.



........


However, we had to file a “complaint” ahead of time in order to get on their agenda, and it was during this time that the local ACLU spokesperson and several of his left-leaning friends also “showed up” at the meeting.


.......


But the average parent has no idea of the kind of sick, perverted material available to our young children in our public libraries! The American Library Association is NOT a government entity and they have no legal power to do what they do, much like the ACLU. However, they use their scare tactics, blaring “censorship” all over the newspapers and most people just back down and they win another one!


We feel your pain, Meredith. 

Friday, October 2, 2009

West Bend School District Budget Cut recommendations according to % - Punishment or Practicality?

I SAY PUNISHMENT.
If the school board recommends a 9% tax levy, or $7.38, the following reductions are recommended for 2009-2010:
Administration Salary Freezes (Note:  Freeze, not reduction)
$ 79,725.00
Custodial and Maintenance Salary Freezes  (Note:  Freeze, not reduction)
$ 81,245.00
Professional/Technology Salary Freeze  (Note:  Freeze, not reduction)
$ 21,800.00
Increase Fees for Community Facility Use
$ 20,000.00
Substitutes for Aides
$ 50,000.00
Increase in Athletic Fees at the High School, $50.00 increase to winter, spring and summer sports
$ 30,000.00
Schools Site Budget Reductions
$ 28,000.00
TOTAL
$ 310,770.00
Cumulative Reductions: $310, 770.00
If the school board recommends an 8% tax levy, or $7.31, the following reductions (including the reductions listed above) are recommended for 2009-2010:
High School Aides (In School Suspension, Library, and Counseling & Parking Attendant
$ 55,000.00
Elementary Aide Reduction Across Sites
$ 15,000.00
Alternate Day Site Cleaning through Maintenance Reduction
$ 200,000.00
Eliminate Curriculum Council Extended Contract Days
$ 20,000.00
Middle School Aides Reduction Across Sites
$ 10,000.00
Curriculum and Instruction Aides
$ 9,260.00
TOTAL
$ 309,260.00
Cumulative Reductions: $620,030.00
If the school board recommends a 7% tax levy, or $7.24, the following reductions (including the reductions listed above) are recommended for 2009-2010:
Program Support Teacher = 1.0 Full Time Equivalent
$ 56,000.00
Middle School Librarian = 1.0 Full Time Equivalent
$ 28,700.00
High School Librarian = 1.0 Full Time Equivalent
$ 28,700.00
Central Office Budget Reduction (What is this exactly?  Paper?  Staples? FTE's?)
$ 40,000.00
Sub Days for the development of Curriculum and Instruction
$ 30,000.00
Middle School Gifted and Talented staffing = 1.2 Full Time Equivalent
$ 34,440.00
High School Gifted and Talented staffing= 1.0 Full Time Equivalent
$ 28,700.00
Eliminate 1.0 Full Time Equivalent Teacher at Spartan/Sun and replace with Aide at Spartan Sun
$ 19,000.00
Elementary Gifted and Talented Teacher = 2.0 Full Time Equivalent
$ 57,400.00
TOTAL
$ 322,940.00
Cumulative Reductions: $942,970.00
If the school board recommends a 6% tax levy, or $7.18, the following reductions (including the reductions listed above) are recommended for 2009-2010:
Elementary Librarian = 1.0 Full Time Equivalent At Semester
$ 28,700.00
High School Class Consolidation At Semester
$ 40,000.00
Kindergarten Teacher = 1.0 Full Time Equivalent (Decorah Elementary School) At Semester
$ 28,700.00
2nd Grade Teacher = 1.0 Full Time Equivalent (Jackson Elementary School) At Semester
$ 28,700.00
Custodial Reclassification to Janitor IV December 1st
$ 75,000.00
Close High School Pool February of 2010 and then Permanently
$ 30,000.00
Eliminate 6th Grade Band /Orchestra at the Middle School At Semester and then Permanently
$ 28,700.00
Eliminate High School Music Lessons At Semester and then Permanently
$ 28,700.00
TOTAL
$ 288,500.00
Cumulative Reductions: $1,231,470.00
The Reductions Listed Below Represent the Remaining Half of Reductions Implemented for Second Semester of the 2009-2010 School Year The Balance of Savings Move to 2010-11 Budget
High School Aides (In School Suspension, Library, and Counseling & Parking Attendant)  Parking attendant?
$ 23,950.00
Middle School Librarian = 1.0 Full Time Equivalent
$ 28,700.00
High School Librarian = 1.0 Full Time Equivalent
$ 28,700.00
Middle School Gifted and Talented = 1.2 Full Time Equivalent
$ 34,440.00
High School Gifted and Talented = 1.0 Full Time Equivalent
$ 28,700.00
Eliminate 1.0 Full Time Equivalent Teacher and replace Aide at Spartan Sun
$ 19,000.00
Elementary Gifted and Talented = 2.0 Full Time Equivalent
$ 57,400.00
Elementary Librarian = 1.0 Full Time Equivalent
$ 28,700.00
Kindergarten Teacher = 1.0 Full Time Equivalent (Decorah Elementary School)
$ 28,700.00
2nd Grade Teacher = 1.0 Full Time Equivalent (Jackson Elementary School)
$ 28,700.00
Close High School Pool
$ 80,000.00
Eliminate 6th Grade Band /Orchestra at the Middle School
$ 28,700.00
Eliminate High School Music Lessons
$ 28,700.00
Total
$ 444,390.00
If the school board recommends a 5% tax levy or lower, additional reductions (including the reductions listed above) would need to be recommended. These reductions represent proposed reductions for the 2010-2011 school year.
One High School (Combine)
$ 200,000.00
Eliminate an Athletic Director = 1.0 Full Time Equivalent
$ 80,000.00
Elementary Dean of Students at McLane
$ 50,000.00
Eliminate Administrative Position potentially Elementary Principal
$ 95,000.00
Middle School - Teachers teach an additional class (6 sections)
$ 700,029.00
High School - Teachers teach an additional class (6 sections)
$ 1,200,000.00
Eliminate Business and Information Technology Department and all classes
$ 261,000.00
Eliminate Business and Information Department Site Budget
$ 19,903.00
Eliminate Business and Information Technology Education Equipment
$ 100,000.00
Eliminate Social Workers = 2.8 Full Time Equivalent
$ 206,000.00
Elementary Fitness Offerings
$ 22,050.00
Eliminate Three Facility Managers
$ 50,000.00
4 Day Week (9.5-10 hours)- Longer School Days (reduction of transportation, utilities, and custodial) Need state approval
$ 250,000.00
Middle School Exploratories (World Culture and Technology Education)
$ 115,000.00
Increase Class Sizes in Non-core classes 35-40 at all levels***
TOTAL
$ 3,348,982.00
***Currently Being Calculated

West Bend School Board levies an opinion

The School District sent this out to the press today.  See next post for cut recommendations in detail.


To:                   Board of Education, Leadership, Staff & Media
From:               Pat Herdrich
Re:                   Proposed reductions for Current Year and next year
Date:               October 2, 2009


Background:

As you know, the community did not pass the levy recommendation at the annual meeting.  For the 2009-10 school year, we removed $2 million dollars from the budget prior to forwarding the levy.  The levy recommendation was to bring us to the levy cap.  The levy increase is estimated from a 9.9% to a 12% levy increase.  The areas for the final percentage are still coming in at this time and will not be available until mid October. 

Next year, we again are impacted by the decrease in state aid. That will be the 4th year in a row.  We hold enrollments stable when we frame the budget planning for next year because we do not want to count on student enrollment in advance of the head count being finalized.  Based on the net loss in open enrollment, and the reductions in programming we are proposing, we are anticipating that open enrollment loss will continue and could accelerate.

We remain the lowest spending district in Southeastern Wisconsin, and among the lowest spending school districts in the state.  We are rank among the top 7% of districts in the state for fiscal responsibility. We have been efficient because of large schools, low staffing ratios, and shared programming. 

We cannot absorb the reduction in aid without again impacting programming. 

Reducing the levy cap does have long-term implications.

Key Areas Impacting the System:

  • This is the 15th and 16th year of the Revenue Limits, low spending system, & program reductions
  • We have gained in enrollment and cut staffing/programming
  • Decrease in State Aid (Last two biennial budgets have impacted our state aid)
  • Low revenue district; Large System
  • Programming is Valued within this Community
    • We spend like a rural school district, but our community wants programming that is similar to that provided in Southeastern Wisconsin
      • Advanced Placement & honors programming
      • Orchestra & programming in the arts
      • Co-curricular & athletic opportunities
  • Shift of aid reduction onto the local tax levy remains the community concern
  • Impact of the QEO being lifted legislatively (no salary cap remains for teachers)
  • Impact of required binding arbitration (we benchmark low)
  • Impact of legislative requirement to bargain prep time
  • Impact of 20 standards legislatively required for programming
  • Impact of cumulative effect of the revenue cap not keeping pace with the costs
  • Long term impact of going below the levy limit on future decision making
    • Arbitration loss (demonstrating capacity to pay and failing to do so)
    • Creating a larger gap in levy impact
      • If we under levy this year and try and recapture that next year the increase at a minimum would likely be a 15% levy increase
      • We will never recapture the loss
  • All stimulus dollars will be gone by 2011-12 creating a greater state deficit
  • If the funding formula does not change, we will continue to be compromised and impact programming even further.

Processing for further reductions:

We are already in the 2009-10 school year.  We can only reduce areas that are not already committed.  The reductions have been framed to bring the levy reduction options down to levels of a 9% increase, an 8% increase, a 7% increase and a 6% increase. 

We are anticipating another $2 million to $3.5 million reduction again next year based on the further loss in state aid for the second year of the biennial budget and the inability to apply any stimulus dollars to create relief.  Therefore, regardless we will continue to cut programming until the state can modify the funding structure. 

Monday evening the board will examine the areas recommended for reduction.  The full leadership team has had input in the process.

The reductions are prioritized and listed by percentage.  We have also listed the first areas for reduction heading into the next school year planning. 

We are calculating what impact raising class sizes up to 35 for grades 3-5 and up to 40 for grades 6-12 would have. 

We will likely have fire code issues with these proposals.  But, we will do the costing. Specials such as Physical Education, Music, Electives will likely be raised to class sizes of 35 to 40.  The core classroom areas likely cannot be based on the size of most of the classrooms.

The recommendation from the leadership team remains to levy to the revenue cap.  Based on the latest projections that would place us at approximately a 10% levy increase.

Not doing so places this system at an even lower level of capacity compared with any system in the region and almost all systems in the state.  Not levying to the cap will likely place us within the lowest 3 spending school districts in the state out of 426 school districts.  We will run the final once the levy limit is finalized.

If we go below the cap this year, we will likely never regain the loss.  The community would need to face at least a 15% levy increase, or higher, to make the difference up in the future.  That would be highly unlikely.  It is also highly unlikely that the leadership team or board would advance an operating referendum increase if we are unable to levy to what we currently have the authority to levy. 

The 2011-12 school year will start the next biennial budget.  There will be no remaining stimulus dollars and the state will lose the dollars they used to fill their funding gap.  Again, if the formula does not change, we will feel the greatest impact.

In summary:

Clearly, the recommended reductions are significant. 

We have reduced programming for 15 years already.  We are already placed in the lowest position.  Therefore, the recommendations being made are not only significant, they will deeply impact the students and their programming options. 

Once removed, it is highly unlikely the community would ever have the capacity, or collective will, to bring them back in the future.

We will continue to heavily advocate for a state aid formula change.  We have done so actively and will continue to do so.

Can I see some proof of this?  I am terribly interested.

In the present time, the leadership team does recommend we levy to the cap.

So does this mean you are recommending that the advisory vote from the citizens should be considered null and void?

If the decision is made to not levy to the cap, we have framed the reductions for the current year.

Let's take a look at the administrative cuts.  Oh, that's right.  There aren't any.

We have also listed where we are likely heading for next school year with the continued reductions.

The guilt trip.  Bring it on. Bad, bad taxpayers.

If anyone has questions, feel free to contact Pat Herdrich. (262-335-5435 OR PHerdrich@west-bend.k12.wi.us )

Meetings:

Worksession of the Board: Monday, October 5th, open meeting no public discussion

(Community Mailer)

Monday, October 12th, regular board meeting, public review reductions

Monday, October 26th, the board will set the levy for the current school year
(2009-10)

________________________________________________________________________
HERE IS THE REDUCTION OUTLINE:


Reductions Outline
West Bend Joint School District
Document for Work Session October 5, 2009


The West Bend School Board proposed property tax levy at the Annual Budget Meeting on Monday, September 28, 2009. The district reduced $2 million dollars within this budget before the proposal was made at the annual meeting. 

If the Board makes the decision not to accept the levy proposal, reductions in the current year will need to be made.  Reductions are anticipated for the next 3 budget years.  Reductions have been made in the last 15 consecutive budgets since the levy limits were put in place in 1993.

This year (2009-2010), due to reductions in state aid, the district will be short approximately $2,400,000.

Next year, the district will plan for an addition $2 million to $3.5 million reductions

1 FTE = 1 position

Terminated FTEs will bump other employees in accordance with hiring order and valid licensures.

Entire programming areas will be recommended for elimination.


If the school board recommends levying to the maximum 9.9% or $7.44, no budget changes would be made to the current 2009-2010 budget.  Note: The levy percentage continues to change based on the information coming to Districts from the State of Wisconsin on equalization and head count.  This number will not be final until mid October and remains an estimate.  The board needs to finalize the levy by October 26th.

Thursday, October 1, 2009

BOGUS BANNED BOOKS WEEK BITES

Curtsy to the Annoyed Librarian


Celebrate "Banned" Books Week!

September 30, 2009 On Monday I must have gotten as confused as the ALA. Here I was writing about Band Books, and the whole time I should have been writing about "Banned" Books, which is what the ALA prattles on about. "Banned" Books are those books that are widely available everywhere in the country that the ALA gets so excited about. Anyway, sorry for the confusion, on both our parts.

What's sad about the ALA "Banned" Books Week is the lengths they go to in order to make themselves more important than they actually are. It's nice that they care about books one week a year, because it gives us a respite from hearing how gaming is going to save libraries, but it's not like we're in any danger of censorship in any meaningful sense. As a comparison, think about the stupid suicide book in Australia. It seems that book was actually censored, and that kind of thing just doesn't happen in America. To defend the presence of some stupid kid's book in a classroom against some rube in Bumflap, GA is one thing, but to claim that by doing so you're fighting "censorship" for our freedom is just sad.


...........


Check out the odd "terms and definitions" from the ALA's own website. According to the ALA, censorship is, "A change in the access status of material, based on the content of the work and made by a governing authority or its representatives." It's obvious that this definition is designed to support theALA's skewed meaning of terms. This definition doesn't even account for the definition of censorship as "government's prior restraint on publication," which is a basic meaning of censorship that everyone but the ALA understands. "Change in the access status of material," in addition to sounding like it was written by a tone deaf committee, does not cover cases of the government refusing to allow a book's publication. In other words, it doesn't cover cases of actual censorship. A state censoring a book doesn't "change its access status." It keeps the "access status" exactly as it had always been.

It's only saving grace as a definition of censorship is that it does acknowledge that the agent of censorship must be "a governing authority or its representatives." But this is undercut as the absurd definition continues, "Such changes include exclusion, restriction, removal, or age/grade level changes." Grade level changes? Oh, goodness, apparently "governing authority" doesn't mean what most people would assume it means, i.e., the government. You know, those people who govern and who have authority. A school principal, for example, is only a "governing authority" in the most limited sense. A public library isn't a "governing authority" or its representative at all in any sense you could give to it. Yet if a book in a public library were challenged as inappropriate for the children's section and it was reclassified into the adult section, the ALA would have to say the book had been "censored." 





.................


The ALA's definition of censorship has no relationship whatsoever to what everyone else in the entire world understands by the word. It's incoherent and self-serving. That hasn't stopped plenty of librarians for going along for the ride. It's a little dispiriting, because there's no point in having intellectual freedom if there is no intellectual capacity.


And for your added reading pleasure, here is some SWEET COMMENTARY.